Local Area Forum made the papers

The Watford Observer wrote an article on the recent Local Area Forum which is worth a read: https://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/news/25478623.ebury-play-area-play-area-a-jungle-amid-knotweed-closure/

The article mentions the Local Government Reorganisation consultation survey, click link below for details. Please can all residents give their views by 30th September: https://rickmansworthresidents.org/2025/09/council-reorganisation-have-your-say-deadline-30-september/

Local Area Forum minutes #2: Ebury Play Area, Aquadrome & Woodland Path

This meeting was attended by multiple local residents. The next Local Area Forum is 13th November.

2. Ebury Play Area

As we are all aware, during the construction of the bridge and renovation of the play area, Japanese Knotweed was brought in to the area with the top soil. A 16-week Remediation Plan is still being negotiated with the contractor in charge of renovating the Play Area. There are 7 different ways that Knotweed can be treated: chemical methods or manual digging methods. In order for the Remediation Plan to start, the most appropriate method needs to be agreed and vetted by the Environment Agency. Certainly the chemical methods are deemed problematic in a place where children will play and next to the River Colne.

One resident said that the Aquadrome was the jewel in the crown of Rickmansworth, that all residents loved it and to see it in rack and ruin – a jungle – is devastating. Another resident requested that the council sue whoever was responsible for the situation.

Ebury Play Area is a jungle

One resident suggested the Aquadrome was “littered with Knotweed and because it’s not a poisonous plant”, the Play Area should be strimmed and opened up for use. This can’t happen because the contractor is still in possession of the site. And the council confirmed that the Aquadrome is not littered with Japanese Knotweed but there are certain areas where treatment is needed every year. Paula Hiscocks suggested that this yearly treatment is all that is needed in this instance for the play area. The council said that they wanted a permanent solution for this area.

One resident asked why all communications about this issue are not in the public domain. But the council said some things that aren’t yet negotiated cannot be in the public domain yet.

So, although this is the same thing the council said 4 months ago, we suspect they can’t tell us anymore because they might be in some sort of legal situation but we hope that they’re getting a good deal, on our behalf!

3. Aquadrome

One resident reported that people had set up tents in the Aquadrome with tent pegs, i.e. flouting the no-dig rule. The council said that the restrictions placed upon the Aquadrome, due to asbestos being found, can be overcome by using vehicles instead of tents and that whoever needs to can always talk with officers of the council.

The council said the annual Boat Rally would like to expand into areas of the Aquadrome and these areas are being investigated.

4. Woodland Path

This path is still closed because a report denounced it as “structurally unsound”. They are awaiting on a FRAPP but this in turn is waiting on new Environment Agency modelling to determine future flooding. The council meet with the Environment Agency weekly to discuss this issue but this new model is always late – the next launch date is set for 29th September but we’re not holding our breath! Once the FRAPP and modelling are in place then the following items need to be agreed for a durable and long-standing path, that will probably cost 6 figures:

  • The route the new path will take
  • The materials used
  • The construction method used.

Let’s all hope the Ebury Play Area contractors aren’t used!

As the meeting drew to a close, there was a consensus among residents that there wasn’t enough time to hear all the questions and queries from locals about the Ebury Play Area/Aquadrome/Woodland path. The council said they hold regular meetings in Penn Chamber, Three Rivers House, Northway – here are the next ones from the TRDC website:

  • Connecting Three Rivers (formerly Local Strategic Partnership and Community Safety Board) meeting on 25th September, 10am
  • Audit Committee meeting on 25th September, 7.30pm
  • Local Plan Sub-Committee meeting on 8th October, 7pm
  • General Public Services and Community Engagement Committee meeting on 14th October, 7.30pm – future agenda.
  • Climate Change and Leisure Committee meeting on 15th October, 7.30pm
  • **Local Area Forum** meeting on 13th November, 7.30pm – future agenda.
  • Full Council meeting on 21st October, 7.30pm – future agenda.

Agendas are usually set after the preceeding meeting. Anyone can attend any meeting to observe only. Questions from members of the public must be submitted in writing beforehand. However, we can freely get involved during Local Area Forum meetings. To suggest topics for any meeting agenda, submit questions for discussion or to request to speak/present, please email: committeeteam@threerivers.gov.uk.

Click here for part 1 of the meeting: Local Government Reorganisation.

Local Area Forum minutes #1: Local Government Reorganisation

This meeting was attended by multiple local residents. The next Local Area Forum is 13th November.

1. Local Government Reorganisation.

Slides on this topic were presented by the Leader of Three Rivers District Council Cllr. Stephen Giles-Medhurst and can be found on the TRDC’s website: www.threerivers.gov.uk or download them here.

As per our previous post from Jon Bishop, there are three options for unitary authorities (areas) which will merge Hertfordshire’s current 11 areas (Three Rivers being one of those areas) into 2, 3 or 4 Unitary Authorities. Note, the option with 4 Unitary Authorities splits Kings Langley over 2 Authorities – is this a good option?!

Unitary Authority options

Multiple local residents asked why we needed this change at all, as Hertfordshire seems to be working rather well. Stephen agreed saying we have the lowest Council tax. But we were told that Central Government issued this demand so we all must engage in this current survey (closes 30th September, cannot be extended) and a secondary consultation by Central government which begins in Jan/Feb until May 2026. The 2nd consultation will have more detail/data like costs and savings for each of the three options, so we can make informed decisions. Please engage with both surveys and voice concerns. If we say what’s important to us in the surveys then we’re more likely to get what we need. They recommended that you tell your MP what you think during the 2nd consultation stage. They also recommended that each person completes each survey, not just one per household.

A few residents asked why 1 unitary authority wasn’t considered but we were told it was considered but rejected by all 11 Hertfordshire areas, across all political spectrums. This is because a Mayor can’t oversee just 1 unitary authority and it’s silly to combine us with Bucks/Essex/Sussex – it’s just too big an area. Central goverment have dictated that all areas in England need an elected Mayor – this is devolution / shifting power from Central government to Local government. Furthermore, Central government have asked our councils to make savings of £50m.

A report created by Consultants Pricewaterhouse purported savings were made when councils merged and pooled their resources and varied services together.

Council tax is the councils’ revenue and currently, 78% of the council tax we pay goes to our County Council and 10% goes to our District Council. 50% of our County Council’s budget is taken up by Adult Care and Children’s services so combining revenue and sharing costs/resources would be beneficial. They called this combining ‘equalisation’ which took into consideration areas that are wealthy vs deprived.

Slide shows services provided by the current councils

Three Rivers currently saves money on our in-house services, like waste collection and certain bus routes. Hopefully we will be merged with councils who have similar in-house services however, most councils have out-sourced these services. We would hate for our services to become so very costly under outsourced contracts so we should all mention this in the survey. An outsourced contract is only as good as the person who negotatiates a good deal for the council, on behalf of us, its residents. Negotiated services, costs and savings must be transparent.

Our RDRA Chairman asked about the current CIL money (Community Infrastructural Levy totalling £2m) earmarked for improvements to our local area but, after Unitary Authorities are set up, could be diverted to non-local areas. They mentioned setting up a Neighbour Area Committee to deal with this but we’re unclear of the details.

Those who face redundancy from this local government change would likely be TUPE’d to alternative but similar companies.

Current contracts would automatically transfer to the Unitary Authorities.

One resident asked whether the Northway building would be kept. They were hopeful, because it’s modern and useful, but there’s no way of knowing really.

Currently, there are 517 councillors in total in Hertfordshire, Three Rivers has 78 County Councillors and 39 District Councillors. Under each new Unitary Authority, the number of councillors is suggested to be between 30-100 and they would need to serve on multiple committees. They’re hoping to introduce evening meetings so that it’s more inclusive, i.e. more people can volunteer to become councillors. If you agree with this inclusive suggestion, please mention it in the survey.

One resident expressed a wish not to be paired with Watford because they’re “always putting up tower blocks” but this cannot be, simply because we’re located near to each other!

A Strategic Authority will also be created to look after Infrastructure projects, which will take over from the PCC (Police and Crime Commissioner). A Mayor will preside over both Unitary and Strategic Authorities. Parish or Town Councils will be an added layer underneath.

One resident questioned whether the Mayor could interfere with the Unitary Authorities work, in a politically motivated way, but we were told that the Mayor cannot “frustrate proceedings”. The Mayor would only really be in charge of transport.

One resident asked why our buses, which are supposed to have a life span of 8 years, are still running on our roads after 16 years. We were told the Council only funds a few bus services.

One resident kept on asking “what happened with Bucks” – this is what we found out:

  • Bucks council tax increased by 5% after they introduced Unitary Authorities.
  • Bucks chose Unitary Authorities whilst it is mandatory for Herts – dictated to by Central government.
  • Bucks didn’t ringfence their SIL money so it was distributed widely.

They also mentioned Surrey had consultations on their change to Unitary Authorities.

By 1st April 2028 the Unitary Authorities will be up and running. In May 2028, there will be elections for the Mayor.

Please spread the word about this consultation – it closes on 30th September!

Local Government Reorganisation Survey: https://www.hertfordshire-lgr.co.uk/

This portion of the meeting was minuted so we expect those minutes to appear in the agenda for the next meeting, found here: https://moderngov.threerivers.gov.uk/ieListMeetings.aspx?CommitteeId=1149

If you need more information about this topic please contact: hertfordshire@connectpa.co.uk.

Click here for part 2 of the meeting: Ebury Play Area, Aquadrome, Woodland Path.

Public invited to join live webinar with PCC and Chief Constable to discuss local crime issues – Tuesday 8th July 9:30am

You are invited to watch a live public webinar next Tuesday where the Police and Crime Commissioner for Hertfordshire Jonathan Ash-Edwards will ask Chief Constable Andy Prophet about local crime and safety issues.

Neighbourhood policing, safer town centres and firearms licensing will be discussed, along with what steps the Constabulary are taking to solve more crimes in Hertfordshire.

The Accountability & Performance Meeting (APM) will be held online and is open to any members of the public who want to attend and watch the proceedings.

It starts at 9.30am on Tuesday 8th July, you can register for free and secure your place at https://bit.ly/JulyAPM2025.

For those who can’t attend in person, a recording of the meeting will be posted on the PCC website.


Dangerous Crossing: Are you a Survivor?

This article will be in the next Ricky News, written by RDRA Committee members Christina Evans, Anne Littlejohn, Andrea Clark & Debbie Wheeler.

The RDRA (Rickmansworth & District Residents’ Association) organised the Batchworth Bridge Crossing Safety Forum on 29th January, in partnership with BCC (Batchworth Community Council) to discuss the hazards of Batchworth Bridge Crossing. Fortunately to date, there has not been a fatality (unless you count the two dead swans). Over 60 residents attended the Forum.

The major concerns highlighted at the Forum:

  • Batchworth Bridge Crossing is frequently used by people of all ages & abilities, night & day.
  • There has been numerous near misses and several accidents.
  • Poorly lit crossing.
  • Drivers can’t see pedestrians at night.
  • Crossing is on the brow of a hill and drivers accelerate towards the crossing.
  • Faded crossing markings (cannot be seen from roundabout).
  • Inadequate and obscured 30mph signage.
  • Crossing is on a dual carriage way – one lane stops, the other lane doesn’t stop.

Suggestions from the Forum were:

  • Improve or add lighting:
    • The white part of the Belisha Beacon poles should be LED lit.
    • Add spotlights on the pole to illuminate pedestrians.
  • Add speed cameras leading to crossing.
  • Smiley Activated Message (SAM).
  • Larger and more frequent 30mph signage.
  • Painting 30mph roundels on roads leading to crossing.
  • Reduce speed from 40mph to 30mph on Riverside Drive (single carriageway).
  • Recent temporary traffic lights worked.

Residents were in favour of permanent traffic lights on the crossing.

What can we do to avert a fatality?

Contact Hertfordshire County Council (HCC) for action to be taken. Request reply. Use the HCC webform to inform them:

  • Near misses or accidents you’ve had or witnessed.
  • Dangers of the crossing.
  • Safety improvements needed.

HCC webform: https://bit.ly/BB-HCC

Or scan the above QR code

Or phone HCC direct: 0300 123 4047

Voice your concerns now!

Notice of our 94th AGM

Our Annual General Meeting will be held on Monday 17th June at 8pm in the Batchworth Educational Centre, Batchworth Lock, Rickmansworth. All are welcome but only members are allowed to vote. Refreshments will be available after the meeting. Please park in Church Street, Moor Lane or Tesco.

The agenda will be:

  1. Apologies for absence
  2. Approve and sign off minutes of the last AGM 
  3. Honorary Treasurer’s Statement of Accounts
  4. To Appoint an Honorary Examiner
  5. Chairman’s Annual Report.
  6. Election of President
  7. Election of Life Vice Presidents
  8. Election of Officers
  9. Election of the Association Committee
  10. Any Other Business
  11. Guest speaker: David Gauke, former MP